This content of ACIM also invites scrutiny from the philosophical angle. The program shows that the entire world we perceive with this feelings can be an illusion and that our correct reality lies beyond this physical realm. That idealistic view, which echoes particular Western concepts, issues the materialistic and scientific foundations of American thought. Experts argue that the declare that the physical world is an impression isn't substantiated by scientific evidence and runs table to the scientific approach, which utilizes visible and measurable phenomena. The notion of an illusory earth might be engaging as a metaphor for the disturbances of understanding caused by the ego, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the empirical support necessary to be described as a valid illustration of reality.

Moreover, the useful software of ACIM's teachings can be problematic. The program advocates for a revolutionary form of forgiveness, indicating that issues are illusions and must be neglected in support of knowing the inherent unity of all beings. While the training of forgiveness may indeed be therapeutic and transformative, ACIM's method may cause  un curso de milagros to restrain respectable emotions and dismiss real injustices. By framing all bad activities as illusions produced by the pride, there is a risk of minimizing or invalidating the existed activities of enduring and trauma. That perspective could be especially hazardous for individuals dealing with significant issues such as punishment or oppression, as it may suppress them from seeking the required help and interventions.

Still another place of rivalry is just how ACIM has been sold and commercialized. Because its publication, ACIM has spawned an important market of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Authorities fight this commercialization undermines the spiritual strength of the teachings, turning what is purported to be a holy text in to a profit-driven enterprise. The proliferation of ACIM-related products and companies has led some to problem the motivations behind its promotion and the reliability of those that state to instruct their principles. This industrial part can make a buffer to true religious exploration, as persons might be more centered on buying another book or participating another course rather than participating profoundly with the teachings themselves.

Furthermore, the course's focus on individual change by way of a modify in notion is visible as very simplified in addressing complicated cultural and endemic issues. ACIM places a solid increased exposure of personal obligation and the ability of the mind to shape one's reality. While this can be empowering, it may also cause an application of spiritual skipping, where individuals use religious methods to avoid confronting difficult aspects of their lives or societal injustices. By focusing largely on changing one's belief, ACIM may possibly neglect the importance of getting concrete actions to deal with cultural, financial, and environmental challenges. That inward target may lead to a form of isolationism, where individuals become therefore absorbed in their personal religious journey which they neglect their responsibilities to the broader community.