From a psychological viewpoint, the roots of ACIM increase questions about its validity. Helen Schucman, the primary scribe of the text, said that the language were dictated to her by an internal voice she discovered as Jesus. This process of obtaining the text through inner dictation, called channeling, is usually achieved with skepticism. Experts argue that channeling may be recognized as a emotional sensation rather than authentic spiritual revelation. Schucman himself was a clinical psychologist, and some claim that the voice she noticed could have been a manifestation of her subconscious mind rather than an external divine entity. Additionally, Schucman expressed ambivalence about the job and its origins, often questioning its authenticity herself. This ambivalence, along with the technique of the text's party, casts uncertainty on the legitimacy of ACIM as a divinely encouraged scripture.

The information of ACIM also encourages scrutiny from the philosophical angle. The program teaches that the entire world we see with our feelings is an illusion and which our correct reality lies beyond that bodily realm. That idealistic view, which echoes david hoffmeister a course in miracles  specific Western ideas, issues the materialistic and scientific foundations of American thought. Authorities disagree that the declare that the physical world is an dream is not substantiated by empirical evidence and operates counter to the clinical technique, which utilizes visible and measurable phenomena. The notion of an illusory world might be compelling as a metaphor for the distortions of understanding due to the confidence, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the scientific help needed to be considered a legitimate representation of reality.

Moreover, the realistic program of ACIM's teachings can be problematic. The course advocates for a revolutionary form of forgiveness, suggesting that issues are illusions and ought to be ignored and only realizing the inherent unity of all beings. While the practice of forgiveness can indeed be therapeutic and transformative, ACIM's approach may possibly lead people to curb reliable emotions and ignore real injustices. By framing all bad experiences as illusions developed by the ego, there's a danger of minimizing or invalidating the existed experiences of suffering and trauma. That perspective may be specially hazardous for persons dealing with critical issues such as for example punishment or oppression, as it may suppress them from seeking the mandatory support and interventions.

Yet another point of competition is the way in which ACIM has been promoted and commercialized. Because their publication, ACIM has spawned a significant industry of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Critics disagree that commercialization undermines the religious reliability of the teachings, turning what's purported to become a holy text in to a profit-driven enterprise. The expansion of ACIM-related products and services and services has light emitting diode some to question the motivations behind their campaign and the authenticity of those that maintain to show their principles. This industrial aspect can make a barrier to authentic spiritual exploration, as people may possibly become more dedicated to purchasing another book or attending the next seminar as opposed to engaging profoundly with the teachings themselves.