Furthermore, the practical application of ACIM's teachings may be problematic. The class advocates for a radical type of forgiveness, suggesting that issues are illusions and must certanly be ignored in support of recognizing the inherent unity of all beings. While the exercise of forgiveness may certainly be healing and transformative, ACIM's strategy might lead people to control reliable feelings and ignore actual injustices. By surrounding all negative experiences as illusions produced by the pride, there is a risk of reducing or invalidating the existed activities of enduring and trauma. That perception can be specially hazardous for persons dealing with significant problems such as punishment or oppression, as it might discourage them from seeking the required support and interventions.

Yet another stage of contention is the way in which ACIM has been advertised and commercialized. Because their distribution, ACIM has spawned a significant business of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Critics argue that commercialization  a course in miracles  undermines the spiritual integrity of the teachings, turning what's supposed to be always a holy text right into a profit-driven enterprise. The proliferation of ACIM-related products and solutions has led some to issue the motivations behind their campaign and the authenticity of those that claim to show their principles. That commercial part can make a barrier to true spiritual exploration, as people may be much more focused on buying the next guide or attending another seminar rather than participating profoundly with the teachings themselves.

Additionally, the course's focus on specific change through a modify in understanding is seen as very basic in addressing complicated cultural and endemic issues. ACIM areas a solid emphasis on particular duty and the ability of your brain to shape one's reality. While this can be empowering, it can also result in a form of spiritual bypassing, where individuals use religious concepts to avoid confronting difficult facets of their lives or societal injustices. By focusing generally on changing one's understanding, ACIM may neglect the significance of getting concrete measures to deal with cultural, financial, and environmental challenges. This inward concentration may cause an application of isolationism, wherever individuals become therefore absorbed within their particular religious journey they neglect their responsibilities to the broader community.

The language and type of ACIM also pose a barrier to their convenience and acceptance. The text is prepared in a heavy, archaic fashion that mimics the King Wayne Bible, which may be off-putting and hard to comprehend for most readers. This complexity can produce an atmosphere of mystique and exclusivity around the teachings, which makes it appear as though only those who are adequately enlightened or focused may grasp its meaning. That inaccessibility may perpetuate a hierarchical energetic, wherever teachers and advanced students are regarded as possessing unique knowledge that is out of take the typical person. Such makeup may foster dependency and prevent the empowerment of an individual to find their own spiritual path.