From a psychological point of view, the beginnings of ACIM raise issues about their validity. Helen Schucman, the principal scribe of the text, said that the language were dictated to her by an interior style she determined as Jesus. This method of getting the writing through internal dictation, called channeling, is usually achieved with skepticism. Experts disagree that channeling may be understood as a psychological trend rather than real spiritual revelation. Schucman herself was a medical psychiatrist, and some claim that the style she heard may have been a manifestation of her subconscious brain as opposed to an additional heavenly entity. Additionally, Schucman expressed ambivalence about the work and its roots, sometimes pondering its authenticity herself. This ambivalence, coupled with the method of the text's party, casts doubt on the legitimacy of ACIM as a divinely encouraged scripture.

The information of ACIM also attracts scrutiny from a philosophical angle. The class shows that the planet we see with your senses is an illusion and that our true truth lies beyond this bodily realm. This idealistic see, which echoes specific Western philosophies, difficulties the materialistic and empirical foundations of European thought. Experts argue that the claim that the bodily world can be an illusion isn't substantiated by scientific evidence and works table to the clinical process, which depends on observable and measurable phenomena. The notion of an illusory world may be persuasive as a metaphor for the disturbances of belief brought on by the ego, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the empirical help needed to be described as a valid representation of reality.

Furthermore, the sensible application of ACIM's teachings may be problematic. The class advocates for a significant type of forgiveness, suggesting that most issues are illusions and should really be overlooked and only realizing the natural unity of most beings. As  teachings of jesus practice of forgiveness may indeed be therapeutic and major, ACIM's strategy may possibly cause persons to suppress respectable feelings and dismiss actual injustices. By framing all bad experiences as illusions created by the pride, there is a risk of minimizing or invalidating the lived activities of enduring and trauma. That perception can be especially hazardous for people working with critical issues such as for instance abuse or oppression, as it can suppress them from seeking the required help and interventions.

Yet another point of argument is the way in which ACIM has been marketed and commercialized. Since its publication, ACIM has spawned a significant industry of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Experts argue this commercialization undermines the religious integrity of the teachings, turning what's purported to become a sacred text into a profit-driven enterprise. The growth of ACIM-related services and products and solutions has led some to question the motivations behind its campaign and the authenticity of those that state to show their principles. This commercial element can create a buffer to real religious exploration, as individuals may possibly be more dedicated to buying the next book or attending the next class as opposed to participating deeply with the teachings themselves.