From the psychological point of view, the origins of ACIM increase questions about its validity. Helen Schucman, the primary scribe of the text, claimed that what were determined to her by an internal style she determined as Jesus. This process of obtaining the text through internal dictation, known as channeling, is usually met with skepticism. Authorities argue that channeling could be understood as a emotional trend rather than real religious revelation. Schucman herself was a medical psychologist, and some suggest that the voice she noticed might have been a manifestation of her subconscious brain as opposed to an additional heavenly entity. Moreover, Schucman stated ambivalence about the work and their sources, occasionally wondering its authenticity herself. That ambivalence, along with the strategy of the text's reception, casts doubt on the legitimacy of ACIM as a divinely influenced scripture.

This content of ACIM also invites scrutiny from the philosophical angle. The program teaches that the world we understand with this senses is an illusion and that our true truth lies beyond this bodily realm. This idealistic view, which echoes specific Eastern philosophies, problems the materialistic and scientific foundations of Western thought. Authorities  david hoffmeister that the declare that the bodily earth is definitely an impression isn't substantiated by scientific evidence and works table to the clinical technique, which depends on observable and measurable phenomena. The thought of an illusory earth may be persuasive as a metaphor for the distortions of perception brought on by the confidence, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the scientific help required to be described as a valid representation of reality.

More over, the sensible software of ACIM's teachings can be problematic. The program advocates for a significant kind of forgiveness, suggesting that most grievances are illusions and should really be ignored in favor of recognizing the natural unity of most beings. As the exercise of forgiveness may certainly be healing and major, ACIM's method may possibly cause persons to suppress respectable emotions and ignore real injustices. By framing all bad experiences as illusions created by the vanity, there is a danger of minimizing or invalidating the existed experiences of enduring and trauma. This perception may be specially hazardous for people dealing with significant dilemmas such as for example abuse or oppression, as it can decrease them from seeking the mandatory help and interventions.

Still another position of rivalry is the way ACIM has been sold and commercialized. Since their distribution, ACIM has spawned a significant industry of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Experts disagree that this commercialization undermines the religious reliability of the teachings, turning what's supposed to be always a sacred text in to a profit-driven enterprise. The proliferation of ACIM-related products and services and companies has led some to problem the motivations behind its promotion and the reliability of those who maintain to show their principles. That professional part can create a buffer to true religious exploration, as individuals might be much more centered on purchasing another guide or attending another class as opposed to interesting profoundly with the teachings themselves.