From the mental point of view, the roots of ACIM increase issues about their validity. Helen Schucman, the principal scribe of the writing, claimed that what were formed to her by an inner voice she identified as Jesus. This process of getting the writing through inner dictation, known as channeling, is usually met with skepticism. Experts fight that channeling could be understood as a psychological phenomenon rather than genuine religious revelation. Schucman herself was a scientific psychologist, and some claim that the voice she seen may have been a manifestation of her subconscious mind rather than an external divine entity. Furthermore, Schucman indicated ambivalence about the task and its origins, occasionally questioning its reliability herself. This ambivalence, in conjunction with the technique of the text's reception, casts uncertainty on the legitimacy of ACIM as a divinely influenced scripture.

The information of ACIM also encourages scrutiny from the philosophical angle. The program shows that the planet we understand with your feelings is definitely an impression and that our true fact lies beyond that bodily realm. That idealistic view, which echoes a course in miracles Western concepts, difficulties the materialistic and empirical foundations of American thought. Critics argue that the declare that the physical world is an illusion is not substantiated by empirical evidence and works counter to the medical method, which relies on visible and measurable phenomena. The idea of an illusory earth might be compelling as a metaphor for the disturbances of notion caused by the vanity, but as a literal assertion, it lacks the scientific support necessary to be described as a valid illustration of reality.

Furthermore, the sensible software of ACIM's teachings could be problematic. The program advocates for a radical kind of forgiveness, indicating that most issues are illusions and ought to be overlooked in support of realizing the natural unity of beings. As the practice of forgiveness can indeed be therapeutic and transformative, ACIM's approach may possibly cause people to restrain genuine feelings and ignore true injustices. By mounting all bad activities as illusions created by the pride, there is a risk of reducing or invalidating the lived activities of enduring and trauma. This perspective may be specially dangerous for people coping with significant dilemmas such as for example abuse or oppression, as it might decrease them from seeking the required help and interventions.

Yet another level of contention is the way ACIM has been advertised and commercialized. Because their book, ACIM has spawned an important market of workshops, seminars, and supplementary materials. Critics fight that commercialization undermines the religious reliability of the teachings, turning what is supposed to be always a sacred text into a profit-driven enterprise. The expansion of ACIM-related items and services has light emitting diode some to question the motivations behind its campaign and the reliability of those who declare to show their principles. That industrial part can make a buffer to authentic spiritual exploration, as people might be much more centered on purchasing another book or participating the next workshop as opposed to interesting deeply with the teachings themselves.